Would you like to Take Charge Card Payments in your Phone: The Best Guide

How to take credit card payments on your phoneShould you can’t accept charge cards for the business, you’re missing out on potential revenue. Many people don’t carry greater than $20 in money with them at any given time, and those that want credit cards have a tendency to spend more money than their funds-transporting counterparts.

However, charge card terminals and merchant services could be a discomfort to cope with, and costly as well. You need to cope with the vetting process and obtain the gear. For many small companies, this method is simply not practical.

Because of companies for example PayPal and Square, nowadays you are able to turn your smartphone or tablet right into a charge card swiper. But which service if you undertake? What must you consider when deciding?

That is why we’re here: that will help you recognize all the intricacies of taking charge card payments together with your smartphone or charge card.

Source: First Data http://www.firstdata.com/en_us/insights/Terminal_Compare_Infographic.html

Source: First Data http://world wide web.firstdata.com/ en_us/insights/Terminal_ Compare_Infographic.html

Charge card swipers are helpful in a number of industries as well as for companies of any size. A friend owns an crafts and arts business and uses PayPal here to simply accept charge card payments when she’s at conventions along with other occasions. There is a pub right by the house that provides its servers charge card swipers instead of getting to cover everything in the bar. And there isn’t any lack of restaurants within the college town my home which use Square along with other POS systems having a mobile integration to allow them to swipe your card around the place instead of taking charge cards over the telephone when ordering delivery.

Would you operate in one of these simple fields? It may be time for you to consider obtaining a card swiper:

Crafts and arts vendors: Would you sell your wares at conventions, art shows, along with other big occasions? You may be a magazine reseller, a painter, a jewellery maker, a clothing store, or perhaps a makeup seller.

Food Service: Food trucks were one of the earliest adopters of mobile card swipers, but there’s an abundance of restaurants which are with them now. PayPal Here and Square both offer POS systems additionally for their mobile card readers, which is ideal for delivery services.

Providers: If it’s not necessary a brick-and-mortar office or base of operation where customers visit you, or maybe you conduct your business in your customers’ homes (carpet cleaning, plumbers, lawn care, mobile dog groomers, exterminators, etc.), a charge card swiper provides you with versatility in addition to credibility, in addition to added security.

Table of Contents

Comprehending the Costs of Accepting Charge Card Payments

Within the traditional business design, to simply accept charge card payments you would need to generate a credit card merchant account. A free account typically entails an in depth review your credit rating and business. For any business that’s just making its ft, this may not be the best choice.

Establishing charge card payments having a service like Square or PayPal Here far less complicated, and almost anybody can perform it. There’s a trade-off with this convenience, however.

Charge card companies assess a little fee to retailers for processing payments. With merchant services and card swipers, the price is made in and deducted instantly, which means you don’t need to bother about having to pay yourself to it. With a free account, you normally get lower rates (one to two percent) due to the decreased risk. Most card swipers charge 3 % or even more (but much more about that later).

It isn’t only the standard charges you need to be worried about when you wish to simply accept charge card payments. You will find costs hidden everywhere, so let’s address a few of these issues:

Internet Availability

Typically, smartphone and tablet card swipers need some kind of Internet connectivity, using a cellular signal or Wi-Fi. I’ve labored enough vendor rooms to state that this is often a problem. Wi-Fi systems at hotels, convention centers, along with other venues could be slow or hard to rely on, especially if you have many people in it. Cell signal during these places can also be hit-or-miss, and also the best carriers vary by region.

Most smartphones nowadays can handle becoming Wi-Fi hotspots, so that you can make your own Wi-Fi. However, this method depends on your phone’s data plan. The greater transactions you are making, the greater data you utilize.

Compatibility

You should also make certain that the products are suitable for the credit card readers. PayPal Here and Square don’t support Home windows Phones, for instance. I finally upgraded from my Home windows Phones for an Android device so it’s stopped to matter for me personally, but it isn’t just Home windows you need to be worried about. There are specific tablets and smartphones running both android and ios that can’t be utilized using these card readers, meaning you’re going to need to change your device — something which can cost you between $500 and $1,000 when you get a brand new flagship device.

It’s not necessary to go down that path, though. I’ve used a classic hands-me-lower mobile phone that labored on Wi-Fi simply to take payments. The thing is, look into the listing of compatible devices prior to committing to 1 service over another.

Also observe that you’re likely to will often have to allow location services in your phone.

Card Compatibility, Manual Entry Charges, Location

My pal, the main one together with her own small business, has two card swipers. The two works 100 % of times (and oddly enough, each appears to operate best having a specific device), therefore we have experienced to type in greater than a couple of card figures.

You’re typically likely to pay more for by hand entering charge card figures due to the and the higher chances — the credit card does not have to physically show up to accomplish the transaction.

Likewise, you’re usually likely to pay more for accepting worldwide cards, and you aren’t going so that you can accept payments outdoors the U.S.

Taxes and Tips

Unless of course you reside within the five U.S. claims that don’t charge florida sales tax, you are more often than not responsible for having to pay florida sales tax for the business, that is usually between 6 and 10 %. Some states also assess local sales taxes on the top from the base rates. Between your charge card charges and florida sales tax, that’s between 7 and 13 % of the revenue from one purchase gone.

Several mobile charge card swipers enables you to add florida sales tax towards the base purchase without requiring you to definitely calculate it, that is handy if you are not keen on math or simply want the transaction to visit more rapidly.

As a substitute, you are able to build the florida sales tax in to the listed prices, which a number of your clients might appreciate.

Finally, based on your industry, you might want to make sure that the charge card swiper you utilize enables your clients to include some advice.

Time to obtain your Money

The ultimate cost to think about for charge card swipers is much more of the convenience fee than anything — it’s time before you access your hard earned money. PayPal Here makes your available funds very quickly for those who have a PayPal bank card, while some may require two full working days before depositing funds inside your account. On the top of this, each service have a slightly different insurance policy for limits and holds. Should you exceed a particular threshold for any single transaction, or total transactions for any certain period (typically seven days), you might find that the service will place a hang on your bank account, that could slow lower payment up to thirty days. Due to the greater risk, services like PayPal and Square tend to be suspicious, despite the fact that you’re managing a perfectly legitimate business.

If you are inside a high-risk industry or have a superior amount of business, you’re most likely best acquiring a free account and taking advantage of certainly one of their mobile solutions.

You’re also likely to want to bother with refunds and chargebacks. For instance, if, for reasons uknown, someone complains to their charge card company and there is a chargeback, PayPal will assess a charge on the top of whatever cash is instantly deducted from your bank account for that chargeback, and PayPal seller protections aren’t readily available for PayPal Here transactions. Square, however, doesn’t assess a chargeback fee, however it may withhold the sum chargeback of your stuff, and frequently the procedure could be a extended one — two months or even more.

Features to consider inside your Mobile Charge Card Readers

Features-wise, you can at any rate expect the fundamentals to stay consistent across smartphone charge card swipers: you are able to swipe cards, by hand key them in, and issue receipts. It’s the small stuff that may ultimately set one company in addition to the rest. A few of the things you might want to consider include:

Record-Keeping for money and Checks

Sure, you can handle your money intake that old fashioned way and allow your bank cope with checks. However, many charge card swipers, for example Flint (which doesn’t really need you to swipe cards, but more about that later) enables you to create digital receipts for money and appearance transactions too.

Important to note: PayPal initially had the opportunity to handle mobile check deposits, but later dropped it, claiming that buyers have discovered “other methods to pay.” While it is true that checks are decreasing, you may still find lots of people using them. A friend, who sells Mary Kay, still deals largely with checks instead of charge cards.

POS Integration

Based on your requirements, you might like to locate a service which has easy POS integration. Square and PayPal both their very own POS systems that complement their mobile solutions. This really is ideal for those who have, say, a mobile food truck in addition to a physical restaurant.

E-Commerce Integration

Likewise, search for easy integration by having an online shop, for those who have one. With sites like Shopify and BigCommerce, you are able to typically integrate with PayPal, which is fantastic for centralizing your accounts. However, this could get tricky based on in which you sell. Amazon . com, for instance, doesn’t accept PayPal payments, and eBay heavily favors PayPal because, well, it owns PayPal. Square really provides you with a choice of building your personal e-commerce store having its own service.

Accounting Integration & More

Would you make use of an accounting service like QuickBooks? If that’s the case, you may prefer the opportunity to transfer your computer data from your card swiping plan to your accounting software. Flint and Square both offer this ability.

Invoicing

Should you choose custom orders, offer services, or provide goods to some business, you’re very acquainted with invoices. With a few services, including PayPal, you will get invoices through them and send these to clients via email. The greatest benefit to this is just that you will get your hard earned money faster because there’s you don’t need to cut a cheque and send it through email.

Voids and Refunds

It’s unfortunate, but you will desire to make accommodations to process refunds and void transactions. Sometimes your finger slips on the key and also you don’t notice until afterward, and often the client just changes their mind. Make certain to know using these functions in whichever service you select.

Card Readers Design

Possibly probably the most ingenious options that come with the PayPal Here readers is its two-part design that enables you to definitely switch a triangular lower and stabilize the readers.

Regrettably, which include depends upon the headphone jack being on the left side from the phone. On my small Universe S5, guess in which the headphone jack is?

Around the right.

Pointless to state there’s greater than a little bit of clumsiness attempting to balance a telephone having a 5.1-inch screen inside your hands whilst stabilizing the credit card readers while swiping the credit card. Particularly when you’re dealing with limited table space. It’s worth searching in the card readers and also the device it’s mounted on and ensuring the look matches your needs.

Permissions for Multiple Users

Would you have several employees? A buddy who helps out when you are working occasions? The opportunity to give permissions to multiple users is useful here. By using it, you are able to enable employees (or perhaps your buddies) to simply accept payments without providing them with full access for your requirements. This really is great if you have multiple booths at occasions, or you send multiple employees on location and every you need so that you can accept payments.

The Main Players

Since we’ve reviewed what you ought to know before you begin even searching at taking charge card payments together with your phone, let’s take a look at a few of the greatest names in the industry and also the pros and cons to every.

paypal-here-logo

PayPal is considered to be a huge in e-commerce. It launched its card swiper service this year. Right from the start, the PayPal Here readers is totally free whenever you order it in the website. To keep your a card readers at Staples or Office Depot, and PayPal will compensate the cost directly with the application, that is readily available for android and ios.

Beyond that, PayPal and PayPal Here offer:

  • Online Invoicing
  • Send digital receipts or print receipts
  • Custom reporting on sales figures (exportable to .CSV file)
  • Cash and appearance payment recording
  • Multiple user permissions

Important to note is always that PayPal offers both its very own POS system for iPads as well as an e-commerce integration for websites. Plus, PayPal may be the preferred approach to payment on eBay (in the end, eBay owns PayPal). PayPal also offers partners offering additional services, which makes it well suited for retail, restaurant, along with other service environments.

Based on PayPal’s site, it’s ready to eat for that October 2015 switch EMV (cards with special chips baked into them for further security), and promises that PayPal Here users can accept EMV cards in addition to touch-enabled cards and NFC payments.

Swipe Rates:

PayPal Here minute rates are just 2.7% per swipe. Keyed in transactions are 3.five percent plus $.15. Add yet another 1 % for worldwide cards. With PayPal, your hard earned money can be obtained to invest practically immediately. If you possess the PayPal business bank card, the different options are it anywhere, not only online.

Square-POS-Logo

Square really was the very first player to create taking charge card payments on the smartphone possible, launching in ’09. Square’s readers can also be free whenever you join the application, or perhaps your can buy one at Target, Walgreens, Best To Buy, Apple Stores, and a number of areas. The Square application can also be suitable for android and ios.

Square also provides features for example:

  • Online invoicing
  • Send digital receipts or print receipts
  • Custom reporting on sales figures (exportable to .CSV file)
  • Record cash and appearance payments
  • Multiple user permissions

Square also provides its very own POS system, Square Register, plus an e-commerce store solution. The Square readers also offers an offline mode, which enables you to definitely accept payments when no internet signal can be obtained. Better still, there isn’t any added cost for offline swipes.

Square also offers announced its EMV-compatible readers, which you’ll pre-order for $29 here.

Swipe Rates: 

Square’s minute rates are 2.75 % per swipe. Manual transactions are 3.five percent plus $.015 per transaction. Square takes 1-2 working days to deposit funds with respect to the time the deposit is initiated.

Flint-mobile-logo

Flint’s mobile charge card payment solution doesn’t depend on extra hardware. Rather, it uses the smartphone’s camera to scan charge cards. The application doesn’t really have a photo record from the card and things are encrypted for security.

  • Record cash and appearance payments
  • Coupon generation (with Passbook compatibility)
  • Multiple user permissions
  • Send e-receipts
  • Custom reporting (downloadable to CSV or text files)
  • QuickBooks integration

Flint doesn’t have a POS system, however it comes with an integration to simply accept payments in your website along with a custom invoicing feature.

So far as EMV goes: transactions using Flint are processed as “card not present,” so EMV is basically irrelevant.

Scan Rates: 

Flint’s minute rates are less than Square’s or PayPal Here, for a price of just one.95 % per transaction for an atm card (scanned or keyed in), and a pair of.95 % for charge cards (scanned or keyed in). Deposits from Flint take 1-a couple of days to process.

LevelUp-logo

LevelUp is yet another less-conventional option to PayPal Here or Square. Rather of card readers, it uses QR codes. This specific option mandates that both retailers and consumers possess the application placed on their phones.

With LevelUp, you receive the next features:

  • Custom reporting
  • Discounts, coupons, and loyalty programs
  • Send digital receipts

You will find less features with LevelUp, but it’s unique for the reason that unlike other available choices, additionally, it works together with Home windows Phones. Additionally, it has support for NFC and iBeacons. You may also select from 50+ integrations along with other companies services.

LevelUp includes a zero-chargeback insurance policy for merchant.

There isn’t any e-commerce support, but LevelUp does offer bar code scanners for retail locations. In addition, there’s a tablet POS option.

Scan Rates:

Rate processing for LevelUp is really a flat 1.95 %, with next-day deposits.

Spark-pay-logo

SparkPay is Capital One’s mobile card readers solution. It provides most of the same features as other mobile card readers, however in this situation, it provides both a totally free option along with a compensated monthly service. Using the monthly service plan, you receive lower swipe rates, so if you possess the greater volume to warrant the main difference on price, you are able to really save a little bit of money.

Features include:

  • Mobile couponing
  • Custom reports
  • Send digital receipts and print receipts.
  • Multiple user permissions

SparkPay hasn’t yet announced its EMV solution — however it promises it will likely be offering compatible card readers.

Swipe Rates: 

For that free plan, the minute rates are 2.7 % per swipe (2.95 % for American Express) and three.7 % for keyed-in transactions.

For that compensated plan ($9.95 monthly), the rates drop to at least one.95 % (still 2.95 % for American Express), and a pair of.95 % for keyed-in transactions.

Funds is going to be available within 2 working days.

payanywhere-logo

PayAnywhere is Wells Fargo’s card swiping service. Additionally for you to get your readers free of PayAnywhere, you will get them in select stores. If you purchase a readers, you need to do get a $10 credit deposited inside your account following the swipe.

Features include:

  • Print receipts and send e-receipts
  • Automatic florida sales tax calculation according to where you are
  • In-application and web reporting
  • Inventory control
  • Support for multiple users
  • PayPal support

PayAnywhere also offers a store solution that provides a free tablet — as lengthy while you process more than $5,000 monthly. Otherwise, it’s a $79 monthly should you fall under that quantity in sales.

Swipe Rates:

The swipe rates for that mobile solution are 2.69 percent (including American Express). For that Storefront solution, that rate drops lower to at least one.69 percent (including American Express) along with a $12.95 monthly service charge. Money is deposited within one working day.

innerfence-logo

Inner Fence falls somewhere in the center of the spectrum so far as charge card payments go. It isn’t strictly a mobile charge card payment provider although not fully a free account provider, either. Inner Fence can also be interesting for the reason that it supports iOS, Android, Home windows, and Mac — you will find, which includes Home windows Phones.

Features include:

  • Florida sales tax calculator
  • Print receipts or send e-receipts
  • Web reporting
  • Multiple user permissions

Yes, Inner Fence functions as a full-scale POS when combined with a Home windows or Mac computer.

Swipe Rates:

So far as prices goes, Inner Fence is quite pricey at $39 monthly plus 2.9 % plus $.30 per swiped transaction. Money is transferred on the moving 2-day basis.

Final Ideas

Accepting charge card payments doesn’t need to be a terrifying prospect, even when you’re running only a small-time business. You can aquire a mobile charge card swiper free of charge oftentimes, even though you will not spend the money for lower charges connected with traditional merchant services, the expense continue to be readily manageable. What you ought to consider would be the hidden costs — not always within the providers, but those that originate from utilizing a data connection, or requiring Wi-Fi. How quickly you receive your hard earned money ought to be a high priority.

Got questions about how to consider charge card payments in your phone? Need to know more on how to accept mobile charge card payments? Tell us!

Melissa Johnson

Melissa Manley is definitely an independent author and editor who loves e-commerce, internet marketing, technology, and social networking. Not so long ago, she earned a journalism degree, but she continued to uncover that they could work at home, researching, editing, and covering the items she found most fascinating. When she’s not associated with her laptop, Melissa usually can be based in the kitchen, studying a magazine, or doing something from the nerdy persuasion.

Melissa Johnson

“”

Square Versus Flint

Flint-vs-Square

Although some mobile processing apps focus exclusively on card-present transactions (like Spark Pay and PayAnywhere), others, like Flint and Square, offer online selling tools to supplement in-person payment options. Should you choose any type of e-commerce, Flint and Square are generally solid payment processing services, presenting an exciting-in-one payment processing solution.

Despite the fact that you’ll pay somewhat steeper transaction charges compared to a conventional payment processor, with mobile-based processors like Flint and Square, it’s not necessary to pay for any monthly charges and its not necessary to undergo the procedure or cost of opening a traditional merchant account. This will make them good payment processing options for lower-volume retailers. Plus, you receive all of the nifty on the internet and mobile features (PayPal is yet another such all-in-one online payment processor take a look at my PayPal versus. Stripe comparison if you are like doing so).

Personally, I really like the simplicity any type of “all-in-one” solution and I’m prepared to pay a bit more not to have multiple accounts with various, sometimes overlapping, services. I additionally consider no monthly charges to become a major plus, thinking about the unpredictable earnings that is included with my being self-employed. Everything stated, both of these processors are certainly not produced equal. While they’re comparable in many areas, after researching both Flint and Square, I’ve found some pretty stark variations backward and forward services.

In the following paragraphs I’ll give a side-by-side comparison of Flint and Square when it comes to online selling features, total cost, reliability, along with other factors. You can chime along with your opinion, yell at me, etc., within the comments.

Contract Length and Early Termination Fee:

Champion: Tie

Here’s the offer with Flint and Square:

  • No contract
  • No early termination fee (since there isn’t any contract to terminate, duh)
  • No fee every month

It’s as easy as that! Just payg. I love this arrangement much better than PayPal’s, making you have to pay a regular monthly fee to obtain all of the features.

Features:

Champion: Square

I love both Square and Flint’s features, but Square has much more of ’em actually, they most likely possess the best set of features associated with a pay-as-you-go mobile payment processor.

Before I list all of the features, I ought to explain that Square and Flint process in-person payments differently: With Square, you utilize a mobile terminal (iPad, Android device, etc.) combined with a totally free card readers. You may also process payments with no readers while using application, however the fee is greater.

Flint is exclusive for the reason that it doesn’t use any type of readers or swiper — rather, the application uses your phone’s camera to scan card figures. Obviously, you may also key the figures in if you want to.

OK, moving forward, here’s a sampling of Square’s best features:

  • Advanced inventory management features – This is when Square really shines. One fantastic aspect is when Square syncs on the internet and in-store sales in inventory management counts.
  • Receipt printing abilities – This selection is particularly absent from Flint’s service.
  • Electronic invoices – In-application or online
  • Located storefront – Great design includes choices for shipping or pickup. Great for quick service/takeout cafes and restaurants in addition to e-commerce.
  • Embeddable item links – This enables you to definitely add some item aimed at your website, outdoors of Square.
  • Coupons – Nice feature to have an online shop.
  • Customer comments management – A valuable feature known as Square Feedback enables you to definitely manage your status and cope with customer complaints before they publish an awful Yelp review.
  • Advanced reporting – Check this out page for an entire listing of reports offered. (There is a lot!)

Now, here are the features you get with Flint:

  • Your personal Merchant ID number (MID) – This can help lead to account stability, and also you don’t acquire one with Square (I’ll delve further into this afterwards).
  • Electronic invoices – In-application or online. Can attach coupons/promotions to invoice.
  • Payment buttons – Customizable, simple to embed in website, attractive integration (much like Square’s embedded item links, but performed differently).
  • Located payment pages – Great for discussing on social networking as well as for companies with no website.

The characteristics Flint has are solid, but taking everything into consideration, Square may be the definite champion here, supplying a more complex group of features. The issue, I suppose, is whether or not you undoubtedly need all of the features Square offers. Begin to see the complete listing of Flint’s features here and on Square’s features in Tom DeSimone’s Square review.

Charges and Rates:

Champion: Tie

Flint and Square are generally great about offering no hidden charges or monthly charges. Therefore it all comes lower towards the transaction charges. Flint offers considerably lower transaction charges for debit payments, but slightly greater charges for credit payments, whereas Square offers the advantage of accepting American stock exchange and Uncover cards, in addition to worldwide payments.

Square doesn’t have monthly charges. Its transaction fee breakdown is really as follows:

  • Swiped transactions: 2.75%
  • Online/invoice transactions: 2.75%
  • Keyed-in transactions: 3.15% + $.15
  • Accepts all major charge cards
  • Accepts worldwide cards via keyed-in transactions
  • No processing limits — but large transactions or high monthly product sales may trigger account suspension

Flint also offers no monthly charges and merely the next transaction charges:

  • Debit transactions: 1.95%
  • Credit transactions: 2.95%

Flint only accepts Visa and MasterCard and doesn’t accept worldwide payments.

Flint also offers the next standard processing limits:

  • Max per scanned transaction: $1000.00
  • Max per typed transaction: $250.00
  • Max each week: $3000.00
  • Max per invoice: $250.00
  • Total invoice limit: $1000.00

Upfront processing limits are frequently a great factor because guess what happens amount will trigger a free account freeze. You should consider asking to have an increase to those limits should you provide Flint with increased details about your company.

For a lot of retailers, Flint will finish up to be the cheaper service due to its excellent 1.95% debit fee (about 50 % of card transactions come from an atm card). However, greater-volume retailers may like the greater payment versatility provided by Square. So, it’s a tie for me personally.

Account stability:

Champion: Flint

Here’s where Square incurs some major issues. When I pointed out formerly, you aren’t getting your personal merchant ID with Square, making your bank account less stable. Many Square customers complain about unfair account freezes, funding holds, as well as account terminations. As Tom DeSimone explains in the Square review:

Square’s aggressive fraud prevention tactics have put many small companies ready where they’re not able to access their earnings as their transactions have elevated an over-all warning sign for a variety of reasons.

A whole lot worse, Square doesn’t even disclose to customers its reasoning behind account freezes, apart from notifying the client they have either “(a) violated the relation to this Agreement, every other agreement you’ve with Square, or Square’s policies, (b) pose an unacceptable credit or fraud risk to all of us, or (c) provide any false, incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information or else participate in fraudulent or illegal conduct.”

Flint customers, however, rarely complain about account stability issues for example funding holds or sudden account terminations. I consider not getting to bother with your funds being withheld a substantial benefit of Flint over Square.

Software and hardware Needs:

Champion: Tie

The Square mobile application and free Square Readers use all newer android and ios devices/os’s. However, you should utilize an iPad to gain access to the receipt printer, cash drawer, and bar code scanner. The $99 Square Stand must also be employed by having an iPad.

Flint can also be suitable for all newer iPhones and Android phones. You may also run the application with an iPad. Not one other hardware is essential simply download the Flint application in the Apple Application Store or Google Play and you’re all set.

Security:

Champion: Tie

Quite a few users might concern yourself with the safety of Flint’s readers-free scanner, however i personally feel confident about utilizing their PCI-compliant technology. Here’s what Flint says around the subject of security:

Flint has integrated with state of the art financial services and infrastructure companies to supply a reliable, secure and scalable platform. Sensitive information is protected based on PCI DSS along with other industry guidelines and all sorts of connections are encrypted for optimum security. The Flint application safely scans only the primary card number. No card data or images are stored on the telephone. Standard card verification info along with a touchscreen signature are needed to accomplish transactions.

Flint also provides a “Mask Card Scan” feature that enables you to definitely stop the center figures from the card in your screen to have an added feeling of security.

Square also offers robust security measures, which you’ll on here — however, many might reason that its exhaustive fraud security measures come at the chance of a less stable account.

Sales and Advertising Transparency:

Champion: Flint

Both Square and Flint offer very-obvious prices transparency, without any sales gimmicks or hidden charges. This really is laudable, and somewhat uncommon within the payment processing world.

However, In my opinion Square’s insufficient disclosure about its frequent account holds — which appears is the primary issue customers complain about — can be viewed as a transparency problem. Disclosure concerning the risks natural with third-party processors plus some obvious processing limits would most likely perform a realm of good in this region. I believe Square also needs to disclose to customers the particular cause of any holds installed on their own account.

Customer Support and Tech Support Team:

Champion: Flint

Square is broadly noted for its poor customer care. Its support channels, provided via email and over the telephone, have apparently improved recently, but you may still find numerous customer complaints about sporadic support.

For instance, Square support claims it’ll answer email queries within 24 hrs, however, many retailers claim it requires nearer to 2-three days to obtain a response. Once the among the primary problems individuals are calling and emailing about is account freezes affecting remarkable ability to work, unresponsive support becomes especially frustrating.

Alternatively finish from the spectrum, you’ll find very couple of complaints about Flint’s customer care. Flint comes with an excellent overall support profile, offering high-quality phone and email support during business hrs (7am-5pm Off-shore, Monday-Friday).

Final Verdict:

Champion: Flint

It wasn’t easy declaring a champion within this race, but ultimately I must choose Flint. Flint’s superior account stability, better-quality customer care, and unbeatable debit transaction charges turn it into a less dangerous and much more affordable choice.

To put it simply, Square has more features than Flint, however the accounts are less stable and could be more costly. I can’t in good conscience recommend Square over Flint understanding that small companies might have their accounts frozen and money withheld without receiving a lot being an explanation.

For low-risk companies that will really take advantage of Square’s added features for example receipt printing and American Express acceptance, Square is certainly worth thinking about. Individuals requiring more complex features may should also take a look at our invoicing software reviews and shopping cart software reviews.

Shannon Vissers

Shannon is really a freelance author and editor located in North Park, CA. Shannon type of wants an apple iphone 7, but she’s not necessarily prepared to lose the headphone jack.

Shannon Vissers

Shannon Vissers

“”

Asana Versus Trello

trello vs asana

Asana is among the leading task keeper programs currently available. This straightforward management tool was produced by former Facebook executives Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein in 2008 to handle their internal coordination. It had been openly released this year and it has become more and more popular ever since then. Intended mainly to improve collaboration while increasing productivity, Asana replaces outmoded types of communication and reduces the requirement for companies to depend email correspondence and daily conferences. Additionally to the fundamental task management features, miracle traffic bot has a host of fine 3rd-party integrations. It’s attracted attention from the 3 major clients, including social networking platforms like Pinterest and Dropbox, a leading file-discussing program.

That stated, with regards to easy and effective task management solutions, Asana is in no way the only real game around. This Year, Fog Creek Software launched Trello, a distinctively structured and highly visual project management software program. Trello is dependant on a Kanban model and basically operates just like a bulletin board on which you’ll pin virtual 3×5 cards. It’s a easy management tool, but it arrives with additional features like file storage, automatic email notifications, and customizable permissions. Trello has presently attracted over five millions users worldwide, including the likes of Kickstarter, PayPal, as well as Google.

Both Asana and Trello offer free, no obligation subscription options, and both of them are lauded for his or her simple features and user-friendly interfaces. They’re not alike in each and every respect, however. Let’s take particular notice in the two competitors and find out the way they really compare when it comes to cost, customer care, and overall design.

Table of Contents

Web-Located or Licensed:

Both of them are web-based.

Software and hardware Needs:

Both Asana and Trello require users to have the internet as well as an up-to-date internet browser.

Prices:

Champion: Tie

When I pointed out above, both Asana and Trello provide a limited, free subscription option. Asana is free of charge for groups as high as 15 people, if you are prepared to forgo certain features and premium customer care. Trello’s no-compensation plan is much more robust and enables for limitless boards, users, and attachments (having a 10 MB max per file upload). So far as cost goes, Asana’s premium plans vary from $21/month (for approximately 5 people) to $750/month (for groups as high as 100), while Trello’s upgraded subscriptions start around $3.75/user/month (for organizations). For more information and particular details about prices, I would recommend that you simply take a look at my Asana and Trello reviews, or check out the organization websites.

Generally, the 2 prices structures are fairly comparable. Asana is unquestionably more costly, however it provides a couple of more features and definitely more 3rd-party integrations. Trello, however, is sort of cheaper but a little more austere when it comes to overall functionality. Another factor to think about is the fact that Asana could give you more for the money with regards to premium plans, but Trello’s free plan is definitely the greater deal backward and forward. For me, with regards to rating both of these competitors by cost, it’s hard to choose a obvious-cut champion. To be able to know which will be a better deal for you personally, you have to sit lower and extremely consider what you would like to make use of the program for. If your fun, simple organizer is all that’s necessary, I’d opt for Trello, but should you prefer a task manager with somewhat more substance, Asana is the best choice.

Simplicity of use:

Champion: Tie

Because Asana and Trello are task management solutions (instead of high-level project management software tools) it’s understandable that both of them are as fundamental and streamlined as you possibly can. User-ambiance may be the hallmark of the good task keeper, nor Asana or Trello fails to get results for the reason that department Asana includes a clean, uncomplicated design, while Trello’s UI is better noted for its simple elegance and looks. Neither program has much, or no, learning curve, and could be mastered rapidly. Truly, the most uninitiated and computer-shy user should end up comfortable within minutes.

Both software packages offer one-step sign-up, mobile access, excellent email integration, easily configurable notifications, and many keyboard shortcuts. Furthermore, Asana offers the choice to color-code projects (for much better organization and faster recognition) and add hypertext, and Trello enables users to include labels and color-code payment dates.

Product Features:

Champion: Tie

Neither Asana or Trello could be characterised like a full-service project management software system, and they’re about on componen with each other with regards to fundamental functionality. Each software includes a limited group of features along with a no-frills set-up that’s been carefully and optimally designed. While both permit task management, file discussing, and straightforward inter-office communication, they are doing differ somewhat in format and organization.

For instance, Asana accounts are broken into discrete workspaces, organizations, and teams. People are assigned tasks that have been categorized by function, department, and so on. Asana also allows users to produce task or project templates and offers color-coded calendars and a straightforward dashboard reporting feature. The characteristics available are simple, but they’re highly functional and made to work on peak efficiency.

Trello is a lot more visually-oriented. When I pointed out above, Trello projects derive from virtual advertising boards that have been pinned with cards, because both versions represents another task. Additional features include customizable permissions, card aging, checklists, the opportunity to copy boards/cards and make templates for common projects or tasks, limitless file attachments, markdown formatting, and interface personalization. This isn’t an entire list, obviously, but read much more about Trello’s set of features on the organization website.

Integrations and Add-Ons:

Champion: Asana

Trello integrates with an above average quantity of other individuals, including:

  • Sunrise Calendar Application
  • Google Drive,
  • Box,
  • Dropbox,
  • OneDrive
  • Zapier

Trello offers a RESTful web API for individuals who would like to design their very own integrations (to learn more concerning the API, click the link).

However, Asana the obvious champion within this category, boasting both a wide open API along with a truly impressive listing of integrations:

  • Chrome Extension
  • Dropbox
  • Google Drive
  • Instagantt
  • Zapier
  • CloudWork
  • Jotana
  • Harvest
  • Sprintboards
  • Github
  • Fancy Hands
  • Usersnap
  • Flowbs
  • Alfred
  • Templana
  • Mailchimp
  • WordPress
  • Evernote
  • DigiSpoke
  • HipChat
  • Campaign Monitor
  • Toggl
  • Zendesk
  • Jira
  • Pivotal Tracker

Click the link for additional info on Asana’s integrations, or visit here to see about Asana’s open API.

Customer Support and Tech Support Team:

Champion: Trello

Though there are lots of similarities backward and forward in customer care, Asana and Trello differ inside a couple of significant ways. Both companies conserve a fairly good social networking presence and both offer well-written instructional articles, up-to-date, self-help knowledgebases, and blogs which users look for updates, cool product releases, and general information about the industry.

Asana, however, falls just a little flat with regards to direct customer care. The organization includes a tiered support system which provides preferential treatment to customers who’ve more costly subscriptions – no good sign. Asana has committed to a couple of video lessons, but many are excessively brief but yet free from significant content. Furthermore, users must complete a normal service form when they possess a question or concern. These types of forms always rub me the wrong manner. They work effectively, certainly, however they tend to produce a feeling of distance between your customer and also the support team.

By comparison, Trello provides users of level with straightforward email support (via support@trello.com). Trello also offers one on Asana within the social networking realm, and really appears to interact customers via Twitter and facebook, making the effort to reply to a quick question instead of referring people to the official support funnel. Feature demands and customer comments are most of Trello’s overall support strategy too, which signifies an admirable degree of curiosity about and concern for that software’s users list.

If you’d want to see Asana’s entire support page on your own, click the link. Trello’s support services can be seen only at that link.

Negative Reviews and Complaints:

Champion: Tie

Asana and Trello include much the same features, so it’s possibly unsurprising they share a good quantity of defects too. There’s a couple of key drawbacks present with both, most particularly a restricted set of features as well as an excessively fundamental design.

Users of have also were not impressed with general inflexibility Asana and Trello are undeniably good task managers, but they’re not made to do anything else. Neither software can definitely be utilized for resource management, scheduling, reporting, or any other things of the more complex nature, and unhappily, neither software will come in a language apart from British. Asana and Trello will also be equally unsuited for enterprise use by large organizations.

Positive Testimonials and reviews:

Champion: Trello

Asana and Trello are recognized by reviewers and users alike for his or her clean, intuitive UIs and eminent user-ambiance. They’ve both received kudos for offering free subscription plans, good mobile access, and friendly customer care. But while Asana is usually noted for its fundamental competence and efficient design, Trello is well known for any more specific reason: its distinctively visual undertake task management.

I have seen my great amount of normal project management software tools, but I’ve never witnessed one that’s as aesthetically appealing or as flat-out fun to make use of. Customers appear to possess a peculiarly strong attachment to Trello too, something unusual within an industry where most goods are pretty indistinguishable and definitely interchangeable.

Final Verdict on Asana versus Trello:

Champion: Trello

As you’ve seen, these competing task management tools are equally matched for simplicity of use and in addition they balance each other out with regards to prices featuring. Asana is a reasonably little more costly however it provides features that Trello just can’t match, like fundamental dashboard reporting. However, Trello is significantly cheaper, offers an infinitely more robust free subscription, and it is made with better visual appeal.

Asana and Trello operate a pretty close race, but in the finish during the day Trello arrives just slightly ahead. Honestly, Asana includes a couple of more many years of operation under its belt and it has committed to a larger number of 3rd-party integrations. I award the advantage to Trello, though, no matter Asana’s many benefits. Why? Because where Asana is generic and typical, Trello is fun and different.

Visually stimulating features like card aging separate Trello from Asana (and from the remainder of its competition in the world of fundamental project management software). It’s cheap, it’s simple to use, also it will get the task done efficiently as well as in an interesting manner. Getting employees to really implement a brand new software system could be excruciating, however i have personally seen disorganized and inefficient people breath new existence and for their work by simply using Trello to trace their daily tasks.

Trello might have one-on Asana when evaluating Asana versus Trello in-depth, but the good thing is that these two companies offer an excellent, functional, and user-friendly task management system. Trello is definitely an awesome choice, but same with Asana, and it might be difficult to go far wrong with either of these.

Julie Titterington

Julie Titterington is really a author, editor, and native Oregonian who resides in the gorgeous Willamette Valley together with her husband and 2 young children. When she’s not writing or testing software, she spends her time studying early twentieth century mystery novels, looking blankly at her iPhone, and continuing to keep her kids given, dressed, and comparatively uninjured.

Julie Titterington

Julie Titterington

“”

Restaurant POS versus Standard POS: What’s best For The Restaurant?

restaurant-ipad-pos-app

Once per week I go to the sandwich shop within my neighborhood for any publish-hike meal. The very first factor I’m welcomed with in the register is a stand-mounted iPad running a slick point-of-purchase (POS) application. If you’ve used one of these simple systems before, you realize they’re altering how a food service industry operates. And when you’re opening a cafe or restaurant in 2015, you’re most likely searching to have an iPad POS solution for the staff.

Table of Contents

Standard POS versus Restaurant POS

A fast Search on the internet on “iPad POS” will produce many more pages of results. There’s an abundance of options, and we’ve reviewed most of them the following at Merchant Maverick. While you find the correct solution for the food service business, you might be wondering in case your search ought to be restricted to restaurant-specific apps, or maybe a far more standard POS application will offer you exactly the same functionality in a better cost. If that’s the case, you’re in luck—I’m going to tackle this from the couple different angles.

With this study I’ll be evaluating three standard POS systems, and three designed particularly for restaurants. The conventional POS apps are Shopkeep, Vend, and iConnectPOS. Representing center category are TouchBistro, Ambur, and Lavu.

Prices

The prices structures for iPad POS apps vary between companies, that make an across-the-board comparison difficult. To help keep things simple, I’ll compare a moderately priced standard application (Shopkeep), towards the least expensive from the restaurant apps within this study (TouchBistro). Here’s the way they break down:

Name Shopkeep TouchBistro
1 terminal $49/month $69/month
2 terminals $98/month $129/month
5 terminals $147/month $249/month

Notice the way the improvement in cost increases while you scale up. The disparity is much more dramatic with other restaurant apps. Lavu’s plans have starter charges up to $2,495 for 3 terminals, which doesn’t include the price of licensing ($149/month plus $20 for every additional terminal). Ambur’s one-size-fits-all prices plan will save you cash with time, however the beginning fee of $999 continues to be hefty.

Hardware

From the hardware perspective there’s no real distinction between center POS apps and also the standard ones. These operate on an iPad, and the opportunity to interface with 3rd party peripherals is available overall.

Features

Do restaurant POS apps offer more functionality than standard ones? Indeed, they are doing. Online ordering, component-level inventory management, table and floor management, and the opportunity to accept tips are features the restaurant apps obtain that are missing from standard ones. However, the conventional apps do include some of the helpful restaurant features like the capability to split checks, a kitchen area display system, and the option to help keep orders open during the period of meals. This means when you use a fast-service restaurant just like a cafe or deli, you might not require the functionality that is included with a cafe or restaurant POS, and you’ll just opt to choose a typical system like Shopkeep.

Support

One factor to bear in mind using the greater-priced restaurant POS systems (Lavu and Ambur) is they offer 24/7 technical support. Compare that towards the least expensive system within this study, iConnectPOS, which only offers 8am-6pm support Monday through Friday. That does not exactly mesh using the hrs on most restaurants. If you go searching for a less expensive solution with limited support, a method crash on the Saturday night puts you in the proverbial creek with no paddle (or the opportunity to take orders digitally).

The Takeaway

So, are restaurant POS systems an easy method to visit? This will depend on which size business you’re running. If you’ve got a small operation just like a cafe or juice bar, you are able to most likely pull off a less expensive, boilerplate POS app and reduce your cost. However, you ought to be ready for extra configuration and the lack of helpful features. Also, possess a plan b in situation the system bricks, because support choices are limited. For anybody searching to deploy a POS system at a complete service restaurant having a wait staff, I’d recommend spending the additional money on a higher-finish solution. The problem you save will cost it.

Jon Titterington

Jon Titterington is really a author from La, California. He first began employed in tech in the year 2006.

Jon Titterington

“”

Spark Pay Versus Intuit GoPayment

Spark Pay-vs-Intuit Go Payment

Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment are a couple of frequently overlooked mobile payment processors. Actually, one might give them a call the red-headed stepchildren of parent companies Capital One (Spark Pay) and Quickbooks (Intuit GoPayment). While have their issues, nor can contend with a 5-star mobile payment processor like Flint Mobile or perhaps a full-fledged online payment processor like CDG Commerce, both processors really possess some good stuff opting for them.

Both Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment offer attractive mobile payment processing rates, including very decent rates for medium-volume retailers (processing greater than $2,000-$3,000/month). GoPayment also provides the advantage of seamless Quickbooks integration, if that’s vital that you you.

According to testimonials in addition to our formerly printed reviews of Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment, I’ve come up with this short article evaluating both mobile services so that you can discover which, if either, of those services might work with your company. If you wish to discuss your personal encounters with either of those services, let’s all get together within the comments section in the finish of this article. See ya there!

Contract Length and Early Termination Fee:

Champion: Spark Pay

Spark Pay is entirely pay-as-you-go, without any contract with no early termination fee.

Intuit GoPayment provides a pay-as-you decide to go, no-contract option, however if you simply sign up for their greater-volume plan, you have to formally request, via mail or fax (!?), to finish your contract or else you will still be billed $19.95/month (more about this ridiculousness later). Additionally they reserve the authority to ask you for a $500 termination fee for “merchant misconduct.” 

Features:

Champion: Intuit GoPayment

Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment have good features, but Intuit GoPayment offers the benefits of your personal credit card merchant account and virtual terminal, in addition to Quickbooks integration. Here’s what you’ll get with every service:

Spark Pay features

  • Mobile debit and credit processing
  • As much as four free mobile charge card readers
  • Aggregate credit card merchant account (distributed to other users)
  • Mobile application features:
    • Online reporting/analytics with StitchLabs integration
    • Inventory reporting
    • Cash drawer connectivity
    • Receipt printer connectivity
    • Customizable electronic receipts
    • Bar code checking with StitchLabs integration
    • QR-code-based offers, distributed through Facebook, Twitter, or email

Intuit GoPayment features

  • Mobile debit and credit processing
  • Mobile card readers (one free swiper)
  • Your personal dedicated credit card merchant account (provided via Intuit’s credit card merchant account services, Intuit QuickBooks Payments) — This plays a role in account stability (theoretically)
  • Virtual terminal — This enables you to definitely process payments from the Internet-connected computer, that is a nice feature
  • Greater processing limits than Spark Pay
  • Mobile application features:
    • Camera scanning— Enables you to employ your smartphone camera to capture card information
    • Equal to 50 users on a single account
    • Customizable SMS or email receipts
    • Quickbooks integration, including capability to record cash and checks for seamless bookkeeping

Charges and Rates:

Champion: Spark Pay

Intuit GoPayment may seem to be the less costly processor some stinky, however if you simply consider the specifics, you’ll realize that you’ll most likely cut costs using Spark Pay versus. GoPayment.

This is actually the fee breakdown for Spark Pay’s two prices plans:

Go Plan

  • No fee every month
  • 2.7% Card Present
  • 3.7% Card Not Present
  • 2.95% Card Present American Express
  • 3.7% Card Not Present American Express

Pro Plan

  • $9.95 Fee Every Month
  • 1.95% Card Present
  • 2.95% Card Not Present
  • 2.95% Card Present American Express
  • 2.95% Card Not Present American Express

You’ll save with Spark Pay’s Pro plan should you process greater than $1,326 monthly:

$1,326 * .0075 = $9.95 = the “Break Even” amount

And here’s the breakdown for GoPayment’s two plans:

“Standard Rates” plan

  • No fee every month
  • 2.40% + $.25 per swiped transaction
  • 3.40% + $.25 per keyed transaction
  • Additional $.15 transaction fee for non-qualified transactions
  • $.20 Batch fee

“Reduced Rates” plan

  • $19.95 fee every month
  • 1.75% + $.25 per swiped transaction
  • 3.15% + $.25 per keyed transaction
  • Additional $.15 transaction fee for non-qualified transactions
  • $.20 Batch fee

To be able to have your savings equal $19.95 (i.e., the break-even point), you should process about $3,070 monthly ($3,070 * .0065 = $19.955), or well above $3,500 to incorporate non-qualified transactions.

The important thing distinction between Spark Pay’s and Intuit’s prices is the fact that Spark Pay doesn’t charge extra for non-qualified transactions. So-known as “non-qualified” transactions include when individuals pay using rewards cards — along with a large portion or perhaps most of buyers pay with rewards cards. It makes sense you finish up having to pay much more in charges with Intuit than you most likely be prepared to, particularly with swiped transactions.

Additionally to rewards cards, Intuit’s non-qualified rate will also apply to business card printing and worldwide cards, amongst others.

Account Stability:

Champion: Tie

Account freezes and fund holds are typical with third-party payment processors generally. Consequently, account problems happen to be reported with Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment.

Intuit provides retailers using their own credit card merchant account (rather of aggregate merchant services like Spark Pay), which, theoretically, should improve account stability and erroneous fraud flags. Regrettably, account freezes and withheld funds for suspicion of fraud are generally reported with Intuit too.

It’s vital that you bear in mind that simply as you have a $10,000 monthly limit, it doesn’t always mean you are able to process just one $3,000 transaction without your bank account getting flagged (this exact situation continues to be as reported by a person of Intuit GoPayment). 

Below are great tips regarding how to avoid credit card merchant account holds, freezes, and terminations.

Software and hardware Issues:

Champion: Tie

Both Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment support an array of cellular devices. Basically, all that you should process payments with either of those services is really a smartphone/tablet along with a data or Wireless connection. That stated, pretty significant device compatibility problems and hardware issues happen to be reported with services.

With Spark Pay, the most popular complaint around the Google Play application store is payments not dealing with due to difficulties with Gps navigation location services (Spark Pay requires, for whatever reason, location services to become enabled when processing payments). In some instances, users report they’re not able to process transactions unless of course they’re linked to Wireless.

Around the Intuit side, many users complain they cannot obtain the card swiper to utilize their device.

Learn more around the devices based on Spark Pay here and also the devices based on Intuit GoPayment here.

Reviews:

In this region it’s just a little hard to look for the champion, or even more like, the greatest loser.

As pointed out, both Spark Pay and Intuit have complaints about functionality difficulties with the hardware/software, in addition to about the account freezes and fund holds which are normal with most 3rd party payment processors. With GoPayment, the account issues are specifically disappointing, since getting a person credit card merchant account should normally prevent such issues, and also, since Intuit’s less-than-responsive customer support apparently causes it to be hard to resolve stated problems.

Particularly difficult, however, are complaints from Intuit GoPayment about insufficient transparency regarding prices and charges. Many purchasers report that they difficulty canceling their account and for that reason ongoing to become billed monthly charges.

Listed here are the greatest complaints and compliments for every service:

Spark Pay reviews

The great:

  • StitchLabs integration (especially barcode scanner)
  • Fair, foreseeable rates, specifically for greater volumes
  • Advanced QR-code offers with an advanced of personalization
  • Quality customer support

Unhealthy:

  • Software problems/device incompatibility
  • Charges being put together
  • App’s requirement to trace where you are using Gps navigation
  • Sudden account terminations/funds withheld, including 120-day moving reserve of fiftyPercent of transactions

Intuit GoPayment reviews

The great:

  • Greater processing limits than other mobile providers, despite pay-as-you-go
  • Seamless QuickBooks integration
  • As much as 50 users may use just one account

Unhealthy:

  • Confusing and undisclosed rates, particularly regarding non-qualified transactions
  • Difficulty canceling account
  • Getting account upgraded (towards the difficult-to-cancel, $19.95/month plan) without request
  • Pressure from Intuit salespeople to upgrade account
  • Bad customer support

For more information on reading user reviews of those services, take a look at our full reviews of Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment. You may also take a look at those reviews within the Google Play Store (Spark Pay/Intuit GoPayment) as well as in the iTunes Application store (Spark Pay/Intuit GoPayment).

Regarding BBB reviews, neither service has their very own separate listing, but you’ll find some reviews of those services underneath the listings of the parent companies (Capital One and Intuit).

Sales and Advertising Transparency:

Champion: Spark Pay

This one’s easy: Spark Pay’s minute rates are more upfront. It normally won’t ask you for extra for swiping “non-qualified” charge cards it normally won’t ask you for for services you do not use (or perhaps in the situation of Intuit GoPayment, services you thought you canceled like six several weeks ago). I additionally like Spark Pay’s straightforward, to-the-point website.

Within the interest of improving their transparency and overall status, Intuit GoPayment ought to be clearer regarding their fee structure as well as allow it to be simpler to cancel your bank account which means you don’t keep getting billed for something don’t want — or possibly weren’t even aware you subscribed to.

Customer Support and Tech Support Team:

Champion: Spark Pay

Users of Spark Pay receive responsive customer care, provided over the telephone during business hrs. Coupled with prompt email support having a about face eventually or fewer, as well as Twitter support, Spark Pay provides a much better overall support experience than Intuit GoPayment, or perhaps in comparison with leading mobile payment provider Square (though it is not saying a great deal).

With Intuit GoPayment, the support experience is lackluster, at the best. They are doing offer phone support and live chat support via the website, but users report unacceptably lengthy hold occasions which once they do finally get a response, it’s frequently under useful. With mobile payment processing, accessible customer care is vital because of the greater quantity of SNAFUs that occur with mobile payments when compared with traditional processing. So, Intuit’s failure here is an issue.

Intuit’s GoPayment website, a minimum of, provides enough information, but it’s type of confusing the same. One wrong turn and you aren’t around the GoPayment website any longer but around the Quickbooks website. Really, it required me a while to even discover the dedicated GoPayment website to begin with.

Final Verdict:

Champion: Spark Pay

Spark Pay and Intuit GoPayment are generally imperfect mobile payment processors. Nor is outright terrible. However, I genuinely think most users have a better knowledge about Spark Pay compared to Intuit GoPayment. Spark Pay is much more affordable since it doesn’t charge an additional fee for non-qualified transactions (i.e., most transactions). They likewise have great customer support, that is no small factor within the paranoid, glitch-prone realm of mobile payment services.

Both services have difficulties with device compatibility in addition to withheld funds and account freezes (much like natural with any third-party processor), but GoPayment’s problems with poor customer care and sneaky charges are, for me, pretty serious flaws. The truth that they routinely still charge people for services they don’t want is, in short, shady.

GoPayment comes with some nice features, like a virtual terminal and dedicated credit card merchant account for every customer – but because pointed out, GoPayment customers puzzlingly experience most of the same account issues that typically include aggregate merchant services. GoPayment integrates well with Quickbooks, but so another mobile processors like Flint. If Quickbooks processing is essential for you, take a look at Flint or CDG Commerce.

If you are searching to prevent account freezes, holds, terminations, etc., and also have experienced them previously, you need to most likely avoid third-party payment processors altogether and check out a “high-risk” credit card merchant account provider like Durango or Payline Data. Even if you’re not high-risk, Payline Data only billed about $5 monthly for his or her standard service, that is frequently worthwhile for that added reassurance. 

Shannon Vissers

Shannon is really a freelance author and editor located in North Park, CA. Shannon type of wants an apple iphone 7, but she’s not necessarily prepared to lose the headphone jack.

Shannon Vissers

Shannon Vissers

“”

Basecamp Versus Asana

Basecamp vs Asana

Basecamp is among the earliest, most broadly used project management software software systems offered to. It had been initially produced with a private web application company, 37Signals, to service the business’s own pressing requirement for a competent project management software system. Based on Jason Fried, obama of 37Signals and something of their founders:

Once we began getting busier we wanted an easy method to handle our client projects. We searched at that which was available on the market, attempted out a couple of options, and felt dissatisfied using what we had.

37Signals started design on the unique, web-based project management software solution in 2003 and symbolically referred to it as Basecamp, possibly to highlight how foundational effective task management would be to the general success associated with a business. Miracle traffic bot has lengthy been celebrated because of its relatively cheap cost tag and undeniably practical design. During the last decade, Basecamp has attracted over nine million users and located a fantastic eight million projects. Generally, Basecamp users are very partisan, and roughly 97% of current customers state that they’d completely recommend the program to buddies and colleagues.

Though Basecamp is really a leader in the world of online task management solutions, it’s not without competition, and something of their most threatening rivals is known as Asana. Like Basecamp in lots of ways, Asana is a straightforward, focused project management software software, made to carefully track the advancement of tasks and enhance interoffice communication. Also much like Basecamp, it had been produced to resolve an interior productivity problem. Former Facebook executives Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein had labored together for sometime before finding they shared a typical frustration:

…despite working alongside smart and arranged people, we spend over our limits time doing “work about work”. This wasted energy – writing and studying emails, attending status conferences, and tracking lower updates – slows us lower, reduces our collective output and keeps us from setting bigger goals.

Moskovitz and Rosenstein showed up by the end that email, documents, files, and wiki would not have the ability to fulfill the “scope of the ambitions.” In 2008, they attempted to build Asana, a brand new type of web application that may help manage Facebook’s internal coordination. Right after being implemented company-wide, Asana started to exchange daily conferences, reduce emails, and usually increase efficiency. The program was formally released towards the public this year and it is now utilized on six continents with a diverse selection of industries and companies.

There isn’t any question that Basecamp and Asana share many characteristics. Both of them are software systems made to streamline task management, and both trade on the truth that there is a clean, user-friendly interface. Similar because they appear, however, Basecamp and Asana differ inside a a couple of important ways. Let’s check out each program and find out how these competitors compare with regards to prices, integrations, along with other crucial features.

Table of Contents

Web-Located or Licensed:

Both of them are entirely web-based.

Software and hardware Needs:

Since they’re located in the cloud, Basecamp and Asana require users to have the internet as well as an up-to-date internet browser.

Prices:

Champion: Basecamp

Basecamp prices vary from $20/month (for 10 projects and 3GB storage) to $150/month (for limitless projects and 100 GB storage). If you want more storage than is allotted for the plan, you can just get it for a small charge. There aren’t any per user costs, that is a big plus. All plans include limitless users and full use of customer care. Basecamp provides a free, two-month trial to be able to test the program before buying. There’s little risk involved with subscribing because there are no lengthy term contracts and you may cancel anytime without any penalties. Basecamp is 100% free for teachers.

Unlike Basecamp, Asana is totally free for groups as high as 15 people. The disposable plan’s somewhat limited, though, if you need premium features and technical support the best choice would be to purchase among the compensated plans including $20/month (for approximately 5 users) to $750/month (for approximately 100 users). Premium plans offer priority support (and use of a passionate support repetition), limitless dashboards and visitors, and the opportunity to create private projects and teams.

The obvious champion here’s Basecamp. Like I said before, Asana has a totally free option, however if you simply actually want to make use of the software at peak efficiency you have to purchase a premium plan. In stark contrast, Basecamp enables you to register limitless users and provides everybody equal chance to gain access to customer care. It’s also significantly cheaper.

Simplicity of use:

Champion: Tie

Basecamp and Asana take presctiption a fairly even keel with regards to user-ambiance. These programs are neat and simple, with intuitive, straightforward user interfaces. Both offer such things as simple one-step sign-up, email integration, great mobile phone applications, easily configurable notifications, quick-add features, and a number of keyboard shortcuts. Furthermore, Basecamp and Asana support drag-and-drop functionality, which makes it very simple to include files, alter the order of tasks, and reorganize projects.

If simplicity of use is you’re after, you can’t fail with Basecamp or Asana. Have been particularly made to be as uncomplicated as you possibly can. There’s basically no learning curve associated with either software, if you have probably the most fundamental computer skills you will be able to work just like a pro within minutes.

Product Features:

Champion: Tie

Basecamp and Asana both include probably the most practical project management software features you can request, although neither software offers higher level tools like resource management or risk calculation. Thinking about how simple they’re, however, it’s amazing what you can achieve using these humble task managers. Each program really pack a punch.

The 2 are organized similarly. Basecamp, like Asana, centers around individual projects that have tasks or lists of tasks. In Basecamp, users are sorted into different organizations and groups, while Asana users are put into workspaces, organizations, and teams. Same idea, different jargon. Organizing account people in this manner causes it to be simpler to transmit quick group bulletins, tag a lot of people into discussions previously, and essentially improve communication overall. Using either software, you are able to assign complex user permissions as well as allow clients limited use of projects.

Both Basecamp and Asana have the ability to discuss specific projects/tasks and begin discussions threads with multiple users. Both permit the attachment of documents and/or images to operate products as well as allow you to schedule conferences, task payment dates, and project deadlines on personal or office-wide calendars. Furthermore, you should use either software to produce project templates or copy common tasks.

There’s a couple of small variations, obviously. Asana distinguishes itself from Basecamp with regards to reporting. It’s lately added some very fundamental analytical tools, together with a dashboard that can help chart project progress. Basecamp doesn’t offer any type of reporting at the moment. However, Basecamp does give users the chance to collaboratively edit text documents – a awesome feature with a lot of possibility of many industries. Typically, though, Basecamp and Asana are evenly matched with regards to the choice, variety, and excellence of their features. If you would like to check the 2 on your own, take a look at Basecamp’s features here or follow this link to determine what Asana provides.

Integrations and Add-Ons:

Champion: Basecamp

Basecamp and Asana might be bare-bones project management software tools, but have invested highly in add-ons and 3rd-party integrations. Basecamp, especially, provides a staggering quantity of add-ons, apps, and integrations, including (but in no way restricted to):

  • Tick
  • Paymo
  • Harvest
  • Chrometa
  • Centreli
  • Hojoki
  • Zapier
  • Project Viewer
  • BusyFlow
  • Backdrop
  • BugHerd
  • Bidsketch
  • SupportBee
  • 88 Miles
  • Paydirt
  • Freckle
  • LessAccounting
  • Time Physician
  • Workstack
  • BigBoard
  • DashStack
  • easyBI

Additionally, developers who would like to design their very own third party integrations may use Basecamp’s API. Get more information at more details.

Asana gives users the choice to build up custom apps on its open API too, and in addition it has a truly impressive listing of integrations:

  • Chrome Extension
  • Dropbox
  • Google Drive
  • Instagantt
  • Zapier
  • CloudWork
  • Jotana
  • Harvest
  • Sprintboards
  • Github
  • Fancy Hands
  • Usersnap
  • Flowbs
  • Alfred
  • Templana
  • Mailchimp
  • WordPress
  • Evernote
  • DigiSpoke
  • HipChat
  • Campaign Monitor
  • Toggl
  • Zendesk

Asana’s choice of integrations is great, but Basecamp has it simply slightly beat within the number and sheer number of applications offered.

Customer Support and Tech Support Team:

Champion: Basecamp 

Basecamp and Asana offer similar customer care services. Both continue a good presence on social networking and provide self-help tools like instructional articles, searchable databases, and blogs. Many of these tools are great sources for updates, and may also be used to find information on new feature releases or simply general industry news. You should check out Basecamp’s full support page here, or follow this link to determine what Asana does when it comes to customer support.

Both companies respond to questions and address technical problems via support request forms. Usually, I am inclined to dislike that approach to customer support. Nobody is particularly full of confidence or reassured regarding their problems after typing out a couple of phrases right into a generic service form and delivering them back in to the void. Getting the choice to email customer care directly is more suitable, for me, and appears much less cold and impersonal. That stated, Basecamp includes a good status for answering support demands rapidly – response time is generally under two minutes during normal operating hrs. And all sorts of Basecamp users receive equal treatment. By comparison, Asana offers preferential, priority plan to customers with increased pricey subscriptions.

Basecamp really increases above Asana with regards to the caliber of support material offered. Asana has produced a couple of tutorial videos, but many are hopelessly generic and full of meaningless jargon. Basecamp’s choice of video lessons is really pretty. Most of them are brief enough to become watchable, but lengthy enough to share helpful information and educate important concepts. Basecamp also edges Asana in its degree of social networking engagement. Asana’s Twitter account is a superb place to consider news, reminders, updates, and press announcements, but it’s rarely accustomed to interact directly with customers. Basecamp’s Twitter feed, however, is monitored carefully during business hrs, and repair reps are quick to reply to questions and answer tweets.

Negative Reviews and Complaints:

Champion: Asana

Basecamp and Asana share numerous excellent characteristics, and so i suppose it isn’t surprising they share drawbacks too. The main complaint from users about these task managers is when inflexible and small-scale they’re. Don’t misunderstand me, Asana and Basecamp are great at the things they’re doing, but they’re both fairly limited in scope and functionality. The two is a practicable choice for higher level resource management, advanced reporting, scheduling, risk/issue management, or other things like that. Typically, they’re equally unsuited for enterprise use too.

Asana includes a very slight advantage within this category, mainly because of one easy fact: Basecamp’s web site is truly awful. Seriously. Basecamp must generate a significant quantity of revenue every year and it has certainly invested a great deal in software designers, marketing, and integrations. We’re speaking a good enormous company with countless users. Why, then, does Basecamp’s website seem like it had been produced to have an opening course in website design at the local people college? Just how can software with your an intuitive UI be connected with your an uncomfortable, confusing website? Admittedly, I’m only a author and have no knowledge of website design, however i know enough to understand that the effective website shouldn’t seem like it had been pieced plus a word processor and an accumulation of 90s-era clip-art.

Positive Testimonials and reviews:

Champion: Tie

Each company excels inside a slightly different way, but it’s impossible to declare a obvious champion within this category. They’ve both received a good quantity of kudos using their users and professional reviewers, most frequently in praise of every software’s clean, intuitive UI and indisputable user-ambiance. Furthermore, clients are happy using the insightful integrations, reliable tech support team, and functioning mobile phone applications supplied by both companies.

Particularly, Basecamp is lauded for offering limitless users with every plan as well as for its reasonable, uncomplicated prices system. Asana sticks out most because of its fundamental competence and efficient design, but individuals are also thrilled using the free subscription option. With regards to lower to client satisfaction, however, Basecamp and Asana are fairly matched.

Final Verdict on Basecamp versus Asana:

Champion: Basecamp

This match was difficult to call. Typically, both of these programs are fairly equivalent with regards to features, integrations, and ease-of-use. They’re both well-designed task managers, deeply rooted in fundamentals. Actually, I’ll just come out and say what we’re all thinking: Basecamp and Asana are essentially exactly the same factor. Aside from one teensy little detail, that’s. Basecamp cost less. Significantly cheaper.

Obviously, I’m being hopelessly hyperbolic. Basecamp and Asana are strikingly similar, although not quite interchangeable. Basecamp is unquestionably cheaper and it has slightly better customer support, but Asana has a minumum of one important feature that Basecamp lacks: dashboard reporting. Have intuitive UIs, but completely different visual appeal.

The truly encouraging remove coming from all this is you can’t fail with either choice, as lengthy you may already know what you’re stepping into. Evaluating Basecamp versus Asana is much like evaluating a Fuji apple having a Red Scrumptious. Same fruit, different flavor. Basecamp is a superb task manager, and thus is Asana. You’re likely to cut back with Basecamp, hands lower, for this reason I gave it the win.

Julie Titterington

Julie Titterington is really a author, editor, and native Oregonian who resides in the gorgeous Willamette Valley together with her husband and 2 young children. When she’s not writing or testing software, she spends her time studying early twentieth century mystery novels, looking blankly at her iPhone, and continuing to keep her kids given, dressed, and comparatively uninjured.

Julie Titterington

Julie Titterington

“”

Watch out for Clover Station POS Scams

Clover-station-POS

There’s been lots of buzz surrounding First Data’s new tablet-based POS products: Clover Station, Clover Small, and Clover Mobile. Bank of the usa A Merchant Account can also be heavily promoting these items. But unlike iPad POS systems, you cannot just download the application and try out the POS. You need to purchase the complete hardware package to determine Clover for action. It has brought many retailers to eBay, searching for any deal. Regrettably, it’s also brought predatory a merchant account companies to market business owners more compared to what they expected.

What’s the offer With Clover POS?

Since the change to nick cards formally arrived in October 2015, many a merchant account companies have developed new hardware solutions with integrated EMV-compliant nick card readers, in addition to NFC readers for acceptance of contactless payments via digital wallets like Apple Pay and Android Pay. We lately reviewed some from the new EMV and NFC card readers available on the market, which you’ll find out about and compare here.

So it’s no shocker that First Data, among the greatest processors in america, has come up with a beautiful, EMV-compliant software and hardware bundle. Unlike standard tablet or smartphone POS software, which utilizes interchangeable hardware, to make use of Clover you have to purchase one of First Data’s proprietary tablet, stand, and card readers bundles. This involves a preliminary hardware investment of approximately $500 to $1,000 per station, which hardware is useless for you if you choose to switch systems.

Still, it’s an attractive and sleek suite of merchandise, using the Clover Small representing competition for a similar readers and software combo provided by Poynt – another new-wave POS hardware developer. But the reality is, it’s fairly costly and business proprietors are searching for the way to get hold of it for a cheap price.

A Merchant Account Scams on eBay

Where do you want to go shopping for a cheap price? eBay, obviously. While researching the Clover Station POS system, I poked around eBay to find out if any systems were for purchase. Initially, I had been impressed to determine a lot of packages at inexpensive price points. And, indeed, a number of them were legitimate gently pre-owned systems up for purchase. Most of the listings, however, were really for credit card merchant account contracts, not only the hardware.

Unless of course you browse the descriptions carefully, you will possibly not even notice that you need to sign a processing agreement to be able to get the machine. Signing up with a a merchant account provider is not something to become taken gently. These contracts can finish up squandering your 1000s of dollars in overpayments and termination charges, in addition to numerous hrs of headaches. Certainly, eBay isn’t the best forum for evaluating these types of services and car loan terms.

What’s happening here’s that resellers of First Data’s payment processing services (like Ignite Payments, a subsidiary make of First Data A Merchant Account with lots of independent offices and agents) can sell merchant services underneath the guise of Clover Station POS hardware. They allow you to accept purchasing the device, after which pressure you into filling out the contract to be able to get the machine.

This practice is deceitful and dishonest. Yes, within the listing they are doing explain the processing contract is required before you decide to get the machine, but the reality is the practice is predatory and away from the welfare from the merchant, who’d ought to enroll in payment processing services in line with the merits from the provider, no eBay item description.

A Good Option to Buy a Clover POS System

The easiest method to purchase Clover POS is to enroll in a free account having a trustworthy reseller that you simply research in-depth. Don’t just join a business simply because they possess the cheapest equipment cost on eBay. Individuals charge card processors are simply attempting to trick you into registering for a free account without getting taken into consideration your car loan terms, processing charges, customer care, along with other key elements.

Certainly one of our favorite suppliers that can setup First Data accounts with Clover POS systems is Payment Depot. The corporation provides transparent and fair prices, alongside exceptional customer care, and it is among the most popular providers for just about any system.

When you buy a Clover Station on eBay, it is possible purchasing not only the hardware: You’re registering for a lengthy-term processing hire a business you realize nothing about, that’s almost certainly likely to incorporate a hefty early termination fee. For me, it’s a gimmick along with a ripoff. Don’t get it done.

It may be worth thinking about other POS options before choosing to move forward with Clover. Take a look at our POS software comparison chart and our led matching system to locate other good choices for your company to check against Clover.

Shannon Vissers

Shannon is really a freelance author and editor located in North Park, CA. Shannon type of wants an apple iphone 7, but she’s not necessarily prepared to lose the headphone jack.

Shannon Vissers

Shannon Vissers

“”

Working together Projects Versus Smartsheet

Teamwork-vs-Smartsheet

Resides in Ireland, Working together.com may be the “proud [creator] of the suite of productivity software,” including Working together Projects, Working together Desk, and Working together Chat. Spurred on with a client request, company founders Peter Coppinger and Daniel Mackey (then of Digital Crew) started to picture an intuitive project management software system – one which could function at an advanced but be easy to use and keep. The brand new software’s first incarnation, Working together Project Manager, was inspired by Basecamp, Apple software, along with a couple of other online applications. It had been released towards the public in October of 2007, and it was so effective that Coppinger and Mackey soon left Digital Crew to concentrate solely on Working together. Because of user feedback and trial-and-error, the product has made great strides during the last eight years, and today includes real-time messaging (via Working together Chat) along with a clever support ticket tool (Working together Desk) that supplement the initial project management software software.

A number of Working together.com’s high-profile users include Pepsi, eBay, Microsoft Studios, PayPal, and Forbes Travel Guide, but it’s used in many different industries. Working together bills itself because the everyman project management software software, available to anybody, anywhere. Actually, Coppinger and Mackey declare that they need Working together software to become “so easy-to-use, our very own computer-shy moms can use it.”

Because Working together strives for user-ambiance, it’s at occasions been made to sacrifice functionality around the alter of ease of access. However, its competitor Smartsheet has got the opposite problem.

Smartsheet, a distinctive project management software software, is better referred to as a beefed-up form of Stand out. With different spreadsheet model (highly unorthodox within the project management software software community), Smartsheet is not only out-of-the-box. Like Frankenstein’s monster, it arrives with a mishmash of apparently incongruous features. Interactive spreadsheets are spliced with fundamental project management software functions, web forms and templates, as well as crowdsourcing abilities. Smartsheet isn’t for novices, and needs a proper working understanding of methods to produce and manipulate spreadsheet formulas.

Despite its intimidating learning curve, Smartsheet may be the software preferred by countless users worldwide. Its number of features and weird concentrate on spreadsheets have attracted an assorted subscriber base, including educational institutions, non-profits, and Fortune 500 corporations.

Working together and Smartsheet are centered on completely different facets of the job atmosphere. Externally, Teamwork’s platform is about communication and collaboration, while Smartsheet focuses on reporting, number crunching, and difficult data. To find out which software is the foremost option for your company, though, we’re gonna need to have a critical look each and every program, evaluating cost, customer support, features, along with other important factors.

Table of Contents

Web-Located or Licensed:

Both Working together Projects and Smartsheet are entirely web-based.

Software and hardware Needs:

Since they’re located in the cloud, Working together Projects and Smartsheet require users to have the internet as well as an up-to-date internet browser.

Prices:

Champion: Working together Projects

Working together Projects has seven different subscription options, beginning having a totally free plan and ratcheting as much as $12/month, $24/month, $49/month, $149/month, or $249/month with respect to the quantity of active projects and storage capacity you need. All plans include limitless users, that is nice. Furthermore, there a company plan readily available for large groups, priced on the situation-by-situation basis. Working together Chat (the im add-on) doesn’t cost anything, but when you’re adding Working together Desk for your subscription, just the first 150 tickets have the freedom next each ticket costs $.05.

You are able to join a 30-day free trial offer of the plans, no charge card needed. Should you choose to subscribe, you’ll be because of the option to cover your plan by charge card or PayPal (annual subscriptions could be invoiced too). Among the best reasons for Working together Project’s prices structure is you can upgrade or downgrade your monthly subscription at any time over time, and you will find no unpredicted cancellation charges. If you wish to downgrade an annual subscription, however, you need to hold back until it’s expired. Discounts can be found to non-profits and academic organizations on the situation-by-situation basis. If you feel you may be eligible for a a lower cost, you are able to contact the organization directly by emailing support@working together.com.

Smartsheet is priced on the per/user system, and cost is dependant on the amount of ‘creators’ on every account (creators are admin-level users who are able to control the interface, generate new spreadsheets, etc). The Fundamental Plan’s least costly, at $14/month for just one creator. They Plan costs $39/month and is made for use by no less than three creators. Enterprise Plans cost on the situation-to-situation basis, with respect to the quantity of creators your require and the quantity of custom features that you simply add. The per/user prices is indeed a bummer, but fortunately all plans include limitless collaborators, account users who are able to communicate with spreadsheets but don’t possess the capacity to create brand new ones.

If you are from the non-profit, school, or government agency, you could get preferred rates by registering to a yearly plan ($139/year for that Fundamental Plan and $399/year for that Team Plan). And then any business or individual can be eligible for a a 17% discount off regular plan prices by registering for a yearly subscription. Plans might be upgraded or downgraded at any time over time, even when you’ve dedicated to a yearly subscription. Like Working together, Smartsheet provides a free trial offer from the software and doesn’t need you to input charge card information.

The 2 are pretty comparable when it comes to cost. Both of them are middle-of-the street and not the least expensive factor available but in no way probably the most costly. However, for me Working together Projects wins this category. It’s not always less expensive than Smartsheet in each and every situation, but amount of money isn’t everything. I love that Working together includes a free plan which provides a bigger number of plans with increased flexible options.

Simplicity of use:

Champion: Working together Projects

Like a company, Working together.com has always valued simplicity. Actually, their original motto was “Project Management Done Affordably.Inches Consistent with that motto, Working together Projects excels in user-ambiance, and it has a clear, intuitive interface that’s usually simple to navigate. Just about everything is easy, self-explanatory, and labelled clearly. Additionally towards the great UI, miracle traffic bot offers several some time and labor-saving features that take a few of the drudgery from everyday work, together with a clever desktop timer application, android and ios mobile phone applications, along with a comprehensive dashboard which supplies an introduction to all your projects along with a real-time activity stream. The dashboard is most likely Working together Projects most user-friendly component. It shows all activity from lately active projects, advises you of daily or approaching due-dates (anything approaching within the next fourteen days), and reminds you about past due tasks.

Smartsheet, however, has a serious learning curve. It’s difficult to use, especially initially, and it is also hard to even learn using it, unless of course you’re already skilled at manipulating spreadsheets. Smartsheet isn’t your fundamental task management system, and it has never claimed to become. It’s, first of all, an intricate spreadsheet program – an excellent-spreadsheet, for a moment. If you are confused by Stand out, you aren’t likely to prosper with Smartsheet. Tricky because it is to understand, Stand out is just Smartsheet’s mild-mannered counterpart.

Over time, after it’s totally setup as well as your team can be used towards the interface, Smartsheet comes with several efficient features that may help you focus less of energy on computer busywork. It offers excellent, highly-rated mobile phone applications for android and ios, drag-and-drop functionality, quick file attachment, and automatic notifications, along with a clever autofill function that looks for patterns within sheets. Any time you insert a brand new row and add data, Smartsheet references formulas within the surrounding rows and instantly fills in new information, even applying special formatting if required. Understandably, this selection is really a way to save time and something less factor you need to consider.

There’s no debate about which software wins in simplicity of use. Working together is made to be selected up rapidly. We have an intentionally simple UI to ensure that individuals will really utilize it. Smartsheet might have many wonderful characteristics, but user-ambiance isn’t one of these.

Product Features:

Champion: Working together Projects

For as easy as it’s, Working together Projects posseses an impressive quantity of features. It is a lot more than an easy task manager, though creating and assigning tasks is easy. When I pointed out before, each user comes with an exportable activity stream that shows recent activity on tasks and projects in addition to approaching milestones and new messages or comments. Working together also provides detailed calendars, email integration, custom permission settings, along with a customizable UI so that you can produce a work atmosphere that most closely fits your working style. You will find multiple file management features (and file versioning), and many Working together Projects plans are integrated with popular file discussing programs, like Box, Dropbox, and Google Drive. Each project includes a Gantt charts (adjusted via drag-and-drop) that runs automatic calculations of task progress and may handle start-to-finish or finish-to-finish task dependencies.

Certainly one of Teamwork’s most practical feature is Lockdown, which enables you to definitely keep tasks private to individual users no matter the organization they fit in with. For payroll and invoicing purposes, users can track their hrs, either by hand or using a timer. Notebook pages may be used to write just about anything, from press announcements to website content. The notebook also enables you to scribble lower random ideas and concepts throughout a project, to ensure that things are in one location. Lastly, Working together has lately added a danger Register that can be used to look for the most important risks in every of the projects.

Apart from its spreadsheet-focused design, Smartsheet is best-noted for offering a large number of pre-made templates and web forms that actually work for from marketing to event intending to budgeting. Projects and jobs are managed via spreadsheets, obviously, which you’ll personalize with new cells or rows, personalized formulas, and conditional formatting. If you would like, you may also link multiple cells together and roll-up information from the 3 sheets. Documents and files could be mounted on individual tasks, much like inside a standard project management software program.

Smartsheet excels with regards to data analysis, while offering thorough reporting features. Visually-oriented people, who might not do their finest work when looking in an infinite ocean of rows and posts, can generate custom workload views, and display each sheet like a calendar or perhaps a Gantt chart. Smartsheet offers decent resource management tools that enable you to track the workload of every worker.

Working together Projects and Smartsheet are generally feature-wealthy, so it’s hard to declare a complete victor within the Features category. However, by supplying a rather wider selection of project management software tools, Working together just seems to edge the competition. Smartsheet’s features are really effective by themselves, but you will find limits as to the spreadsheets can perform.

Integrations and Add-Ons:

Champion: Smartsheet

Working together has committed to a great range of 3rd-party applications, and could be integrated with:

  • Box
  • Xero
  • FreshBooks
  • Zendesk
  • Calendar Sync
  • Time Physician
  • TimeCamp
  • InVision
  • Taco
  • TrackDuck
  • NiftyQuoter
  • iDoneThis
  • SupportBee
  • Blinksale
  • Quick Books
  • Harvest
  • Dropbox
  • Google Drive
  • OneDrive

Additionally, you should use Zapier to integrate your Working together account with lots of other apps, including GitHub, YouTube, Evernote, Salesforce, far more more. You should use Teamwork’s REST API to build up your personal add-ons, apps along with other integrations. For additional info on this and yet another compatible programs pointed out, browse the official TeamworkPM integrations FAQ.

Smartsheet also includes many integrations, including:

  • Google (Google Apps, Google Drive, Google Chrome, etc.)
  • Box
  • Salesforce
  • DocuSign
  • Evernote
  • Harvest
  • Mailchimp
  • Marketo
  • AppsGuru
  • Jira
  • Zapier
  • 123ContactForm
  • Centrify
  • ClicData
  • Bitium
  • Klipfolio
  • Easy Insight
  • Okta
  • OneLogin
  • Meldium
  • PingOne
  • Tools4Ever
  • Tableau

You will find others integrations like well and much more being added constantly, so for an entire list, click the link. Like Working together, Smartsheet provides an open API to ensure that users can design their very own integrations.

Customer Support and Tech Support Team:

Champion: Tie

Both companies provide great customer support and a number of educational tools. Working together.com provides you with full use of a searchable knowledgebase together with FAQs, tips about getting began, and finest practices for implementing Working together Projects. On a single page you will find a connect to an assistance request form. If you’d prefer not to make use of the form provided, you can just email the support team at support@working together.com, or make use of the live chat feature online. Working together claims that many demands are clarified within nine minutes during normal business hrs, and that’s been true in my opinion. Working together also conducts customer care reports after every customer interaction, and presently has a 96% satisfaction rate. The organization maintains an energetic social networking presence on Twitter and facebook. The Working together.com Facebook account is a superb place to get tips, request advice, and remain apprised of updates and inclusions in the program. The Working together Twitter feed, too, enables you to definitely pose questions straight to company reps, bounce ideas around, and maintain new additions and bug fixes.

Much like Working together.com, Smartsheet provides a number of customer care options, including email support, live webinars, video lessons, in-application tips, and instructional articles. The webinars are an excellent way to become familiar with the program, and also the video lessons could be useful too, but remember that they’re fairly dry. Subscribers towards the Enterprise plan also receive dedicated technical account managers – an incredible bonus, and price the additional money, for me. Smartsheet provides a Facebook page for convenient use of press announcements, blog entries, and software updates, and a few people make use of this site to inquire about a quick question and/or check up on the status of bugs or temporary software issues. Smartsheet’s Twitter feed includes a similar focus, although it is much more heavily focused on supplying status updates.

Negative Reviews and Complaints:

Champion: Working together Projects

Not everybody is impressed with Working together Projects’ UI. It might be simple to learn, however, many users find task management to become a tiresome process, requiring too many clicks and steps. Other medication is disappointed using the software’s degree of functionality it’s a mid-range project management software solution, in the end, so there’s something it doesn’t prosper. Working together does not have a classy scheduling mechanism, and it is reporting features are run-of-the-mill. It’s also stated to become shateringly slow at occasions.

Smartsheet’s primary problem, apart from the inherently limited nature of spreadsheets, has ended-complexity. For many users, Smartsheet is simply too much to deal with. It’s great possibility of analyzing data and tracking information, but to produce this potential you need to know precisely what you’re doing. Smartsheet needs a good knowledge of spreadsheet formulas, a minimum of just starting out of establishing a free account. Furthermore, it fails to deliver with regards to inter-office communication. When I pointed out above, spreadsheets can’t try everything. Each sheet is really a separate entity. It’s easy to track user activity sheet by sheet, but there’s no real spot for managers to determine an extensive, up-to-date activity stream. Smartsheet is ideal for data analysis, but it’s not too efficient at fundamental, everyday project management software, which needs a certain degree of transparency and communication.

Positive Testimonials and reviews:

Champion: Tie

Generally, individuals are impressed with Working together Projects. Based on one happy customer, the program is “powerful enough to become valuable, yet intuitive enough that it’s really used.” Within lies the actual charm and benefit of Working together. Users are content using the reasonable prices structure, the versatility from the features and also the interface, and overall simplicity of use. Lots of people have commented they use Working together since it is the only real program available that enables these to assign tasks to several people.

Smartsheet is a touch too complicated to possess universal appeal, however it hasn’t attracted countless users for free. There’s a great deal to love about Smartsheet. It arrives with an incredible number of 3rd-party apps and integrations, and individuals rave concerning the company’s iOS mobile application, which functions wonderful. Smartsheet could be versatile if you are intelligent about establishing your bank account, which is able to talking with many needs inside a company (thus its attract diverse industries). Users are thrilled concerning the software’s reporting abilities, and happy to possess a program that resembles Stand out, but better for office-wide use.

Final Verdict:

Champion: Working together Projects

Overall – to me, a minimum of – Teamwork may be the apparent champion. I’ve nothing against Smartsheet, but Working together Projects is really a more well-rounded product with better request for many companies. Smartsheet might be an reporting excellent tool (which is fantastic at generating web forms), but it’s not really a viable project manager. I suggest Smartsheet completely for data analysis along with other things like that, however i would not utilize it to handle tasks or people.

Working together Projects has its own flaws, obviously, however in general I’m very impressed using its balance of function and ease of access. Whenever you combine flexible features along with a user-friendly interface with great customer support and a lot of integrations, you come forth with a genuine champion Working together.com offers quite a bit to are proud of.

If you are thinking about exploring other Working together and Smartsheet competitors, you might like to take a look at our project management software software reviews section.

Julie Titterington

Julie Titterington is really a author, editor, and native Oregonian who resides in the gorgeous Willamette Valley together with her husband and 2 young children. When she’s not writing or testing software, she spends her time studying early twentieth century mystery novels, looking blankly at her iPhone, and continuing to keep her kids given, dressed, and comparatively uninjured.

Julie Titterington

Julie Titterington

“”

Square’s EMV Nick Card Readers Unboxing and Review


Square-chip-card-emv-reader-unboxing-review

Square brought the way in which for that mobile processing boom, so it’s no shocker the company was the first to promote having a headphone jack nick card readers in front of the October 2015 nation-wide shift to nick cards. Some other mobile processors are biding time and telling customers that the nick card option would be “in the whole shebang,Inches Square debuted its nick card readers design late in 2014 and started accepting pre-orders around the same time frame.

Allow me to be obvious: All mobile payments apps that process transactions as card-present will possess a nick card readers by October, otherwise they’ll likely get free from the game (like Leaf POS). However with its excellent group of engineers and sizable jump, Square certainly has an advantage within the race and, come October, its readers will most likely function as the most tested and therefore probably the most reliable.

We ought to observe that other mobile processors that do not depend on swiping cards might not be effected through the nick card transition, since their transactions are technically processed as card-not-present. If this sounds like the situation, providers like Flint Mobile – which utilizes your phone’s camera to scan the credit card with no additional hardware – might find themselves better off since users won’t have to incur any extra hardware cost or hiccups.

But camera checking apps aside, Square is poised to achieve the best headphone jack EMV-compliant mobile nick card readers available on the market this summer time as business proprietors start to bother with the nick takeover.

My knowledge about Square’s nick card readers was entirely positive. It showed up with beautiful packaging and sufficient instructions, and labored flawlessly during a number of tests. I scanned dozens of transactions with no single error. It loads rapidly, reads rapidly, and works just as described. It’s small, simple to use, and doesn’t need a Bluetooth link. This is actually the first headphone jack nick card readers I’ve used, but it’s difficult to imagine a lot of enhancements came from here.

But here’s one pretty significant disadvantage for that Square nick card readers: No Uncover Card nick compatibility! Although this feature should launch eventually (hopefully by October), for the time being you’ll need to swipe all Uncover transactions.

Browse the full review and unboxing pictures below. Should you be undecided about upgrading your Square readers, I really hope this puts the mind comfortable. It’s not necessary to hurry, but because we obtain nearer to October you’ll likely see longer shipping delays because of elevated demand. So certainly order by September. Otherwise, it never hurts to become accustomed to the brand new hardware meanwhile. You’re likely already seeing nick cards out of your customers. Adding the additional layer of security can help you to protect against chargebacks and funding holds before the October 15th switch.

You can observe our in-depth Square Register review here, and out mobile processing comparison chart here if you are interested. Happy selling!

Table of Contents

Packaging:

Only nine days once i placed my order, the readers showed up via United states postal service. It shipped after four days. Square states it will require between two and three days to obtain the readers – and this can be true as demand increases – until then they appear to crank the orders out. I ought to observe that while my order mentioned which i may need to sign for that package, no signature was really needed. The readers was delivered within my mailbox using the regular mail.

What’s within the Box?

  • Nick card/magnetic stripe card readers
  • USB charging cord (USB to Micro USB)
  • Instructions (British and Spanish)
  • Emblem sticker (Square, Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Uncover)

Square’s Nick Card Readers Specs:

  • Cost: $29 ($31.32 with tax, free delivery)
  • Weight: 20 grams (under an oz)
  • Dimensions: 1.31″ H (2″ if including jack)  x 1.31″ W x  .56″ D
  • Time for you to arrive: 9 days from order date
  • Time for you to charge very first time: twenty minutes
  • Time for you to scan card: Under 1 second
  • Time for you to connect: two to three seconds (each time application is opened up)
  • How lengthy will a charge last? A lengthy time. Multiple times of heavy use.

So far as battery existence, observe that the very first time I made use of it battery appeared to empty more rapidly, possibly because of the initial firmware update. After that it appeared to carry up very well. Reconnecting over and over appears to become a bigger drain around the battery than running transactions.

The next images compare the brand new readers towards the old model. Clearly the older model may be the smaller sized one around the left.

Connecting towards the Device:

Every time you open the application, even though you haven’t removed the readers, the program will require a matter of seconds to acknowledge and fasten towards the hardware. This never required greater than three seconds, even if your readers is taken away and reinserted. I did not experience any glitches or slow starts.

Not Only for Nick Cards:

This readers really has two slots: someone to insert nick cards, and the other to swipe magnetic stripe cards. Even if your nick card shift is available in October, you will probably still visit a fair quantity of mag stripe cards in circulation, so it’s vital that you support them in to the near future to prevent lost sales. Fortunately you won’t be required to take with you two separate readers! The swipe slot will act as it has, and it is easily differentiated in the nick slot since the nick readers includes a barrier that stops swiping in addition to three visible metal connectors that browse the nick circuit. These connection points also actually firmly contain the nick card in position throughout the transaction.

Nick and Signature, Not PIN:

If you’ve seen European mobile nick card readers, you know the way bulky and inconvenient nick and PIN card readers could be. Since these readers need a dedicated PIN pad (i.e., the PIN can’t be joined around the devices touchscreen), these visitors completely outside of the telephone and communicate via Bluetooth. Which means you need to take with you and keep an eye on two devices, each of which may need substantial charging.

The Square nick card readers does require charging, but each charge lasts quite some time. And also, since it connects to the headphone jack, it will not consume your device’s battery by utilizing Bluetooth.

In america, we’re mainly likely to see nick and signature charge cards. Prepaid credit cards don’t require a PIN, only a signature. For transactions under $25, you may still turn the signature prompt off just like previous versions. If (or when) the united states switches to nick and PIN, we’ll visit a new wave of hardware. On the other hand there isn’t any need to take with you a bulky secondary device.

Troubleshooting:

Here are a few things common items you might encounter when first by using this readers:

  1. Charge the readers just before use: By trying for doing things as they are without charging, it will not work. You should check the proportion of charge residing in Settings.
  2. Improve your application: If you work with a classic form of the application, the nick readers will not be recognized.
  3. Don’t insert the credit card too soon: You need to insert the credit card only when you are getting towards the screen that states Insert, Swipe or Enter Number.
  4. Don’t take away the card too soon: The credit card must stay in the readers before the transaction is finished. Don’t remove it throughout the tip screen. The client must sign using the card still within the slot! Yeah, this is often a little inconvenient, but it is also safer.
  5. Your system is not compatible: Square lists compatible devices here. I tested this with an apple iphone 4, 5, and 6 without any problems.
  6. Your situation is obstructing the bond: As the Square card readers is really among the finest designed readers when it comes to situation compatibility, certain cases are simply too bulky. Used to do test drive it by having an Otterbox Defender (a fairly bulky situation) and also got it using a little finagling. (The readers must be verticle with respect to utilize that situation.)
  7. Browse the instructions: Should you browse the instructions just before use, you likely won’t have problems!

Whenever you connect your billed nick card readers the very first time, the Square Register application will initiate a firmware update. This takes only a couple of seconds.

Square Nick and Contactless Readers Review:

We’ve preordered the brand new nick and contactless readers from Square ($50), coming fall 2015. This allows companies to simply accept NFC payments alongside EMV-compliant nick card transactions. Consider an evaluation with that hardware soon! There’s additionally a Square EMV readers made particularly because of its Square Stand hardware. That readers is wireless and works via Bluetooth.

For now, certainly think about this nick card readers. It’s pretty affordable so far as mobile nick card readers go, although countertop EMV-compliant charge card machines are less costly than you may imagine. Helcim sells them just for $199, including an integrated receipt printer and PIN pad. Considering just how much a standalone printer or PIN pad would cost, it’s a very solid deal. But when it comes to mobile – Square’s readers is actually reasonable.

Since you’ve read our Square nick card readers review, you might like to take a look at our in-depth overview of the Square application and repair, and check out our mobile processing comparison chart too!

Have you ever used Square’s nick card readers? Have you ever used a mobile nick card readers from another brand? Tell us your ideas and encounters within the comments.

“”

FiveStars versus Belly

FiveStars-vs-Belly

Fivestars premiered by Victor Ho and Matt Doka during the cold months of 2011. It services SMBs (medium and small companies) having a customizable loyalty program. The Fivestars Loyalty program utilizes a universal card (which fits for just about any business using Fivestars), along with a customer’s telephone number to trace and incentivize purchases made at the business. Fivestars also provides the opportunity to market your location using special SMS text campaigns, in addition to reward customers for social networking interactions, and may integrate with lots of POS systems. If you are searching for simple, you’ll think it is in Fivestars, but it isn’t your main option.

Belly’s loyalty program is powered via a customer-facing iPad completely outside of your POS system. Founder Logan LaHive created out a distinct segment for Belly among local companies in Chicago, gaining a Moxie award this year for the best UX (consumer experience). Similar to Fivestars, Belly utilizes a universal card to trace customer interactions, and physical cards could be substituted with the mobile application.

Fivestars and Belly share similar features, but exactly how each program works, and, more to the point, whether it’ll fit your small business, needs a much deeper look. Read the entire reviews for Belly and Fivestars here around the Merchant Maverick site. Continue studying to check prices, features, support, and overall function for every company.

Table of Contents

Fivestars hardware is in your area installed on your pc or POS terminal. You’ll require an up-to-date browser to see your dashboard, though. However, Belly utilizes a specifically designed iPad preloaded using the Belly loyalty software and needs a web connection.

Fivestars loyalty software programs are installed using a USB. All Belly software is a component of the Belly-provided iPad.

Champion: Belly

Fivestars costs average around $2500 annually, with a lot more campaigns and options to select from. Belly offers tiered prices options varying from $99 – $199 monthly, having a one-time $150 installation fee tacked on for that lower plans. You might be able to negotiate your monthly subscription with Fivestars, based on your company needs, but Belly provides a free trial offer duration of thirty days. Both Fivestars and Belly require contracts including 6 several weeks to some year. With Fivestars, you’re obligated to pay for the duration of your hire Belly, cancellations are susceptible to a 6 month cancellation fee.

Champion: Belly

Fivestars and Belly both get good marks for simplicity of use, but maintenance for Belly is lower, as well as your employees do not need to follow along with any extra steps, apart from answering the periodic question. The general consumer experience for Belly is greater compared to Fivestars, and also the program is more engaging and interactive compared to Fivestars program.

So far as installation goes, POS integration with Fivestars is fairly seamless, with Belly installation is basically tethering your iPad to some secure location and establishing the Wi-Fi.

Champion: Fivestars

Both Fivestars and Belly supply you with a representative to help you on the way, however they offer additional compensated choices for expert consultancy. Both of them provide customizable loyalty programs and e-mail marketing strategies, in addition to detailed reports relating to your program and campaigns. Have a downloadable mobile application for the customers. Both give a universal card to be used at any company that utilizes them, but Fivestars doesn’t require people to scan their loyalty card. They are able to use their telephone number rather. Belly requires checking either the credit card or even the mobile application.

Where Fivestars sets itself apart is thru its SMS texting features. The Autopilot program enables you to definitely send several predefined campaigns to gather information out of your customers or lure them to go back to your company. Fivestars also provides a choice of discretionary texts, which may be generated unconditionally (i.e. special promotions while offering). The reports available are more in depth too, since Fivestars integrates directly together with your POS system.

Belly requires a more direct approach with regards to getting feedback out of your customers. Prompts for social networking interaction via Yelp, Twitter, and Facebook can be found immediately after checking in. Belly’s mobile application can also be better quality and provides the choice to interact from your company link in addition to supplying a scanner that you can use instead of the Belly card. The main one concern I’ve with Belly’s program may be the per visit check-in process. Made to encourage repeat visits, Belly’s approach is problematic. A per-dollar point system ties revenue straight to rewards. A per-visit point system awards exactly the same quantity of points whether a person spends $5 or $50. The opportunity to distinguish backward and forward and incentivize greater expenses are what the program is missing.

Champion: Fivestars

Fivestars has additional campaigns you can include to boost your program while offering integration with multiple POS systems. Belly is really a standalone product, so no integrations can be found.

Champion: Fivestars

Support for Fivestars could be utilized through phone or email. The organization offer pretty extensive tutorials and video tutorials via Fivestars College, a light-weight support page, along with a blog. Support for Belly can be obtained through its line. You may also connect to the website for FAQs, in addition to the organization blog, however these choices are for very fundamental support. Belly provides an additional resource hub covering marketing practices, video lessons and testimonials.

My customer support encounters with Fivestars and Belly weren’t everything impressive, but local retailers appear happy with their support, so I’ll defer for them.

Champion: Belly

The most typical complaint against Fivestars originates from mobile application users. The mobile application has very couple of features and does not have a mobile scanner. Other complaints originate from their cancellation policy along with the way Fivestars does business. Customers who join your business’s program basically become customers of Fivestars. Fivestars can send purports to individuals customers associated with your company, in order to another business that utilizes Fivestars. This reveals the doorway to conflict and may potentially remove your edge against your competitors.

Belly has gotten its great amount of malcontent over its cancellation policy too, but the commonest complaint originates from customers using Belly outdoors of chicago. Belly is excellent at marketing Belly, particularly in Chicago, however for companies outdoors of Chicago, the motivation to participate Belly just isn’t as high. Obviously, you are able to operate a effective loyalty program no matter the number of companies use Belly, however the perk of the universal card -you can use at exactly one place- sheds.

What I’d want to see from both Belly and Fivestars is really a coalition program. Many companies have taken advantage of loyalty programs that provide rewards at areas (think supermarkets and gas rewards), so that as both companies broaden their nets, the opportunity of an excellent coalition program can there be.

Champion: Fivestars

Retailers using Fivestars have reported significant increases in profits after while using program. Used strategically, Fivestars can definitely strengthen the connection between customers and companies with time. Additionally, it will get heavy praise from local retailers because of its support.

In which the Fivestars mobile application is missing, the Belly application is extremely popular. So far as figures go, Fivestars has roughly 1500 reviews within the Google Play store when compared to 7000+ reviews for Belly, I believe it’s safe to declare a champion within the mobile application category. Belly is usually preferred among customers using it, and also the application will get great reviews.

Evaluating money to overall recognition, I believe Fivestars arrives ahead over time. If Belly can be their recognition means elevated profits for the business, we’ll reevaluate that assessment.

Champion: Tie

Awesome apps and clever features aside, how can these businesses strengthen your business? Will they:

  • Increase repeat business? For Fivestars and Belly the reply is yes, however in this the champion is Fivestars. Fivestars’ focus on worker training and relationship building puts it within the edge within this category. Fivestars offers video tutorials and guidelines to simplify the register process making the loyalty program simple for people to understand. This program is made to still engage your clients via email and text lengthy after they’ve visited where you are. Belly offers incentives to customers for coming back for your business, but individuals visits aren’t associated with revenue. Belly also provides special campaign features via email, but when compared to campaign features provided by Fivestars, they simply aren’t nearly as good. The character from the Belly program may increase appointments with Belly locations generally, although not always for your business.
  • Generate start up business? Yes for Fivestars, you will find for Belly, but Belly wins. All companies using Fivestars are viewable to customers through the website and mobile application. You have to Belly, but discoverability is a lot greater with Belly because of the recognition of their mobile application, along with its social networking interactions.
  • Provide you with a edge against your competitors? Yes to both, but, when i pointed out above, this might not necessarily function as the situation. Belly and Fivestars match this category, simply because it really depends upon in which you conduct business. Belly may be the less expensive option and a fantastic choice in case your competition has either no loyalty program or perhaps a very fundamental one. However, should you choose business within an area saturated with loyalty programs, Fivestars provides a more serious, although more costly, option and may really increase profitability.

Champion: Fivestars

Searching at these loyalty programs alongside, there’s a great deal to consider. While Fivestars arrives slightly ahead for getting a much better program overall, Belly holds its very own pretty much. Fivestars provides a better quality program its SMS campaigns possess a farther achieve compared to classical email strategies, and contains better customer care options, in addition to a more reliable roi. However, Belly’s deficiencies could be easily overcome, particularly with this type of popular program and smartly designed application, and a straightforward tie-directly into revenue might make an impact.

Phylicia Joannis

Phylicia is really a freelancer, indie author, and Google addict. She accustomed to scout all New York’s free venues in her own free time, however she’s reviewing loyalty rewards software for Merchant Maverick. Her professional background includes technical writing and research, though she’s also fluent in toddler gibberish. When she’s not crying over spilled milk, Phylicia enjoys studying, writing, and performing random Google searches.

Phylicia Joannis

“”